It's challenging enough for parents who become involved in the protective service system. Even those who
want to cooperate and
try to do what they are told can get frustrated when they get conflicting information and advice.
For example, other parents (including staff) might give advice based on "what worked for me," which might not be research-based, trauma-informed, or effective. Even more problematic and confusing are the
"evidence-based" parenting programs that have studies showing their program gets short-term results, but what they teach is not supported by research and actually gets negative long-term outcomes!
The best examples of this are
parenting programs that teach "behavior modification" or external motivators and "reinforcements." These
will "work" in the short-run, but decades of research consistently show they are ineffective and counter-productive long-term, creating expectations of and a dependency on external motivators. These quick fixes
destroy self-motivation, self-responsibility, self-discipline and many other positive qualities most parents want their children to develop.
Some research even shows they can be harmful or abusive! (
Learn more here.) With children who are already vulnerable or exploited, it's important for adults to avoid making them
more bribe-able.
These two completely opposite approaches can be found in "evidence-based" parenting programs. So if some members of the child welfare team (primary parents, substitute caregivers, or staff) attend training that teaches the one approach while other members attend training that teaches the other, they will be in direct conflict with each other and it will negatively affect their relationship and outcomes.
It's important for
all members of the child welfare team to learn how to
avoid these quick fixes and instead use language and action skills that research shows consistently have positive short-
and long-term outcomes with both children and adults.
So choosing a program that can train all team members in these methods is important.